Today I was fortunate enough to get some free time and nice weather to try out some clay shooting with my Mossberg 930 12ga shotgun. I also got to try out my new Trius 1 Step clay thrower. It was fun day but I have a long way to go before I can could be rated even marginally competent.
Here's a video of one of my few hits:
As you can see from this short video, the Trius really wings the targets out there. I was launching the targets myself using the spring loaded pedal. By the time I got my balance, the targets were already out at a challenging distance.
I did do better later when I switch to my left foot as the launching foot. Shortly before I quit, I had hit 3 of the last 4 targets.
The video was shot with a DVK808 #11 keychain camera taped to a hat. It seemed to work pretty well. It did have some issues maintaining consistent color as my view shifted from ground to sky.
I did run into a minor technical problem with the camera + hat + tape setup.
Next time, I'll use more tape. Luckily the camera is pretty tough.
One thing that disappointed me is amount of litter at the range. I expected clays, clay pieces, and maybe a few missed shell hulls. Instead I found lots of shell hulls (clearly no attempt to pick them up at all) and trash. Boxes, soda cups, cans, plastic bags. Just lots of trash. I cleaned up my stuff and a bit more, but there is still plenty more. Since there was no one there, I also reclaimed a few unbroken targets.
Friday, April 15, 2011
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Ohio Senate Passes Restaurant Carry SB 17 (Not law yet)
Today the Ohio Senate passed its own version of a law to allow concealed weapons carry in restaurants that serve alcohol just one day after it left committee. This puts the efforts of the Ohio House to shame as the their version (HB 45) has been sitting immobile on the House calendar for 2 weeks.
Click here to see work get done. SB 17 Video
Following these bills for the last month or so has been enlightening. I have a much better understanding of how the House works. On thing in particular came as a surprise to me. I had assumed that many hours day were spent in the main auditorium debating the merit of bills and taking votes. Not so. The House seems to meet 2-3 times a week for a little over an hour. At least half that time will be spent doing things that have nothing to do with legislating. They honor soldiers, teachers, boy scouts, or sports teams. They introduce resolutions to give a day a name day or congratulate someone. What little time the do spend actually doing legislation seems rushed and haphazard.
I haven't been following the Senate since I assume the House would be first with a bill out the door. One thing I, and apparently many other people, have yet to understand is who makes the schedule. I still don't know who gets to decide when bills get a vote. The videos of the sessions reveal nothing on this. If anyone who reads this knows. Feel free to comment.
Hopefully, the house can get this Senate Bill passed and sent for a swift signing at the Governor's desk. It is just a shame they had to spend so much time in committee debating their version of the bill that is now irrelevant.
Click here to see work get done. SB 17 Video
Following these bills for the last month or so has been enlightening. I have a much better understanding of how the House works. On thing in particular came as a surprise to me. I had assumed that many hours day were spent in the main auditorium debating the merit of bills and taking votes. Not so. The House seems to meet 2-3 times a week for a little over an hour. At least half that time will be spent doing things that have nothing to do with legislating. They honor soldiers, teachers, boy scouts, or sports teams. They introduce resolutions to give a day a name day or congratulate someone. What little time the do spend actually doing legislation seems rushed and haphazard.
I haven't been following the Senate since I assume the House would be first with a bill out the door. One thing I, and apparently many other people, have yet to understand is who makes the schedule. I still don't know who gets to decide when bills get a vote. The videos of the sessions reveal nothing on this. If anyone who reads this knows. Feel free to comment.
Hopefully, the house can get this Senate Bill passed and sent for a swift signing at the Governor's desk. It is just a shame they had to spend so much time in committee debating their version of the bill that is now irrelevant.
Sunday, March 20, 2011
First trip to the range 2011.
Today I finally got to enjoy my first day of target practice this year without snow on the ground. My trip to the ODNR range turned out to be much more pleasant that I hoped as the temperature quickly reached 60F. I had planned to hop around the between the 50 and 25 yard ranges for some rifle and pistol shooting. However, I ended up just camping on the 50 trying to master my Ruger 10/22 with iron sights. I still had a few adjustments to make to the sights to get it shooting straight. I think I mostly have dialed into the point where any fault in aiming is mine now. Here are some of my targets with quarter included for size reference.
As you can see I was getting better at the end, but you'd still stand a fair chance of a long and happy life as a red dot on the other end of my Ruger 10/22 at 50 yards.
Then I switched over to my Savage 17 HMR + scope package--still at 50 yards. These pictures include a dime for reference. Every shot fired is on that target at least in the black of the one I was aiming at. I do love that gun.
After finishing up at the rifle range I went looking for the unsupervised hand trap, clay shooting, range. I had heard rumor of it, and had even seen it on the park map. However, it still wasn't clear to me exactly where it was or what to expect. I did find it. There were about 6 people there when I arrived. I managed to avoid getting them in my pictures. My thought was it would be nice to use a clay launcher, but I wasn't sure if it was allowed. I found very limited signage, and the people there were using a spring loaded launcher. So, I guess it is ok.
Below is a map showing the unsupervised hand trap area. GPS: N41 23.471 W80 55.419
View Grand River Hand Trap Clay Range in a larger map
Here are the signs I found:
I think I'll be getting a clay thrower so I can give this a try sometime in the future.
After that, I finished the trip up with a stop to Blazing Bill's for the best perch sandwich I've been able to find. All in all, it was a very good day.
As you can see I was getting better at the end, but you'd still stand a fair chance of a long and happy life as a red dot on the other end of my Ruger 10/22 at 50 yards.
Then I switched over to my Savage 17 HMR + scope package--still at 50 yards. These pictures include a dime for reference. Every shot fired is on that target at least in the black of the one I was aiming at. I do love that gun.
After finishing up at the rifle range I went looking for the unsupervised hand trap, clay shooting, range. I had heard rumor of it, and had even seen it on the park map. However, it still wasn't clear to me exactly where it was or what to expect. I did find it. There were about 6 people there when I arrived. I managed to avoid getting them in my pictures. My thought was it would be nice to use a clay launcher, but I wasn't sure if it was allowed. I found very limited signage, and the people there were using a spring loaded launcher. So, I guess it is ok.
Below is a map showing the unsupervised hand trap area. GPS: N41 23.471 W80 55.419
View Grand River Hand Trap Clay Range in a larger map
Here are the signs I found:
 |
| This was at the entrance. Notice there is no real mention of a target range. |
 |
| This sign is as you leave the parking lot headed toward the range. Notice that some idiot shot it. |
 |
| This picture and the next one are from the firing line looking out over the target field. |
I think I'll be getting a clay thrower so I can give this a try sometime in the future.
After that, I finished the trip up with a stop to Blazing Bill's for the best perch sandwich I've been able to find. All in all, it was a very good day.
Saturday, March 5, 2011
Restaurant Carry HB45 up for committee vote
The Ohio House restaurant carry bill may be up for a committee vote March 8th. Now is the time to contact your representatives to show support. More details available here at the Buckeye Firearms Association.
Sunday, February 13, 2011
Restaurant Carry Lives Again
The restaurant carry bills have returned to the Ohio legislature. This time they separated the part of the bill that would allow people who had committed certain minor drug related crimes to eventually get their second amendment rights returned. I think it was a wise move to separate them.
Details at http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/7654.
Restaurant Carry: HB45, SB17
Restoration of Rights: HB54, SB61
I fully support, encourage, and desire restaurant carry. I encourage all how read this to support it as well.
I am less certain on the restoration of rights to misdemeanor drug offenders. I'd much rather we make up our minds as to whether using things like marijuana are really crimes or not. Treating it as half a crime isn't good for anyone. As it is, I'm torn. Important human right restored, or less-than-totally-responsible person with gun. I'd love to see a video of debate on HB54/SB61. I'd love to see some stats showing drug users aren't overwhelmingly total dumbasses and failures at life before deciding. I haven't met enough to know.
Details at http://www.buckeyefirearms.org/node/7654.
Restaurant Carry: HB45, SB17
Restoration of Rights: HB54, SB61
I fully support, encourage, and desire restaurant carry. I encourage all how read this to support it as well.
I am less certain on the restoration of rights to misdemeanor drug offenders. I'd much rather we make up our minds as to whether using things like marijuana are really crimes or not. Treating it as half a crime isn't good for anyone. As it is, I'm torn. Important human right restored, or less-than-totally-responsible person with gun. I'd love to see a video of debate on HB54/SB61. I'd love to see some stats showing drug users aren't overwhelmingly total dumbasses and failures at life before deciding. I haven't met enough to know.
Monday, January 24, 2011
21 Foot Rule
21 feet is often considered the distance at which the advantage of having a holstered gun is about even with that of having a knife. This is a popular topic of debate among the those who think a lot about self defense. However when discussing such things it is important not to come off like a lunatic that has lost all perspective.
Take this guy for instance... He manages to come off a little creepy.
Video 1 (Watch first)
Thankfully you can always count on another clever Internet user to present an alternate point of view.
Video 2 (Watch second)
Take this guy for instance... He manages to come off a little creepy.
Video 1 (Watch first)
Thankfully you can always count on another clever Internet user to present an alternate point of view.
Video 2 (Watch second)
Friday, January 21, 2011
H.R. 308, the "Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act."
The bill to limit gun magazines 10 rounds has been introduced. Details can be found here. I haven't been able to find the bill text just yet. Supposedly, it lacks protection for existing property that original 90s assault weapons ban had.
(Updated) Bill text and other details can be found here.
Register at PopVox to make your opinion known. https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/112/hr308
(Updated) Bill text and other details can be found here.
Register at PopVox to make your opinion known. https://www.popvox.com/bills/us/112/hr308
Thursday, January 20, 2011
John Lott Weighs in on Post-Arizona Gun Control
In the wake of the Tucson, Arizona shooting there have been a many comments from scared politicians hoping to make everyone feel better by passing new laws to limit access to guns or gun accessories. While their hearts might be in the right place, it is sometimes helpful to apply some math instead fear based random brainstorming to solve a problem.
Here is an opinion piece by John R. Lott Jr. outlining his thoughts on the subject. He is a statistician, author, and in general very smart man. I also recommend his book "More Guns, Less Crime," particularly if you enjoy math. The even if you happen to somehow not agree with his conclusions the raw crime statistics are fascinating.
Again I encourage you read Mr. Lott's opinion. With that said, here is my opinion.
One of the more popular ideas is to ban "high capacity" gun magazines. While I don't think 30+ round magazines for handguns are particularly practical, I very much disagree with banning the sale of items that are not in and of themselves unreasonably dangerous. I also very much disagree with their threshold for what constitutes "high capacity." Ten rounds is generally the number thrown around. Most full sized semi-automatic handguns come standard with 15-17 round magazines, so 10 would hardly be considered the norm. It doesn't make sense to pass a law that would limit such a common item.
Every law has a costs. Costs to pass, costs to document, costs to enforce, costs to prosecute, and perhaps most importantly costs legal credibility.
Each law passed subtracts credibility from all the laws that came before it. The human mind can only hold so many rules. If there are too many laws with so little obvious application to public safety, it becomes difficult to take any of them seriously. If every day a citizen lives is a minefield of seeming trivial rules and regulations, eventually they must resign themselves to the impossibility of living totally within the law.
Due to the sheer number of laws in the US it is hard to imagine that during a lifetime any citizen could get by without breaking some law, probably many, without even knowing it. If there are too many laws they become a burden on society instead of value. All citizens become potential victims of political or personality driven selective enforcement, and basic rights suffer because of it. Iran is good example of this. Everyone there ignores all the little laws and live de facto free lives--which is fine until they say something someone in power doesn't like and law enforcement comes by with their magnifying glass looking for a way to make them disappear. We need real freedom, not de facto freedom created by lax law enforcement.
I beg legislators to consider a few things when deciding to add new a law:
1. Does the law really solve the problem? Can you prove it?
2. Is it already covered under existing law? Or can the same thing be accomplished by removing language from existing laws or making minor modifications?
3. Is reasonable for a citizen to comply with the law? Would they need knowledge or tools that aren't likely to be accessible in order to comply? Is it common sense that there would even be a regulation about the thing or action being controlled?
4. Can the law be practically enforced?
5. Is the law worth enforcing consistently, all of the time, even if it means other laws get less attention?
6. Is whatever problem this law might solve worth the negative affect on daily life the law may have multiplied by the total population? For instance, would reducing the chance of 1 person being injured be worth 1 hour of 300 million peoples lives?
7. Remember that MANY people have given their lives to keep this country free. Perhaps if they thought freedom our was worth near certain death for themselves, we can concede that it is also worth a 0.0001% increased probability of death for ourselves.
Here is an opinion piece by John R. Lott Jr. outlining his thoughts on the subject. He is a statistician, author, and in general very smart man. I also recommend his book "More Guns, Less Crime," particularly if you enjoy math. The even if you happen to somehow not agree with his conclusions the raw crime statistics are fascinating.
Again I encourage you read Mr. Lott's opinion. With that said, here is my opinion.
One of the more popular ideas is to ban "high capacity" gun magazines. While I don't think 30+ round magazines for handguns are particularly practical, I very much disagree with banning the sale of items that are not in and of themselves unreasonably dangerous. I also very much disagree with their threshold for what constitutes "high capacity." Ten rounds is generally the number thrown around. Most full sized semi-automatic handguns come standard with 15-17 round magazines, so 10 would hardly be considered the norm. It doesn't make sense to pass a law that would limit such a common item.
Every law has a costs. Costs to pass, costs to document, costs to enforce, costs to prosecute, and perhaps most importantly costs legal credibility.
Each law passed subtracts credibility from all the laws that came before it. The human mind can only hold so many rules. If there are too many laws with so little obvious application to public safety, it becomes difficult to take any of them seriously. If every day a citizen lives is a minefield of seeming trivial rules and regulations, eventually they must resign themselves to the impossibility of living totally within the law.
Due to the sheer number of laws in the US it is hard to imagine that during a lifetime any citizen could get by without breaking some law, probably many, without even knowing it. If there are too many laws they become a burden on society instead of value. All citizens become potential victims of political or personality driven selective enforcement, and basic rights suffer because of it. Iran is good example of this. Everyone there ignores all the little laws and live de facto free lives--which is fine until they say something someone in power doesn't like and law enforcement comes by with their magnifying glass looking for a way to make them disappear. We need real freedom, not de facto freedom created by lax law enforcement.
I beg legislators to consider a few things when deciding to add new a law:
1. Does the law really solve the problem? Can you prove it?
2. Is it already covered under existing law? Or can the same thing be accomplished by removing language from existing laws or making minor modifications?
3. Is reasonable for a citizen to comply with the law? Would they need knowledge or tools that aren't likely to be accessible in order to comply? Is it common sense that there would even be a regulation about the thing or action being controlled?
4. Can the law be practically enforced?
5. Is the law worth enforcing consistently, all of the time, even if it means other laws get less attention?
6. Is whatever problem this law might solve worth the negative affect on daily life the law may have multiplied by the total population? For instance, would reducing the chance of 1 person being injured be worth 1 hour of 300 million peoples lives?
7. Remember that MANY people have given their lives to keep this country free. Perhaps if they thought freedom our was worth near certain death for themselves, we can concede that it is also worth a 0.0001% increased probability of death for ourselves.
Monday, November 1, 2010
Tomorrow's Vote
For my friends who could use some help tomorrow. Here are my voting plans for tomorrow. The list mostly reflects the NRA recommended list. This is a particularly important time for 2nd Amendment rights in the state of Ohio. So Governor, Supreme Court, Attorney General and State House and State Senate are particularly critical choices.
The most important ones are in orange.
Governor - Ted Strickland (D)
Lieutenant Governor - Mary Taylor (R)
Attorney General - Richard Cordray (D)
Secretary of State - Jon Husted (R)
Auditor - Dave Yost (R)
Treasurer - Josh Mandel (R)
Chief Justice of Ohio Supreme Court - Maureen O'Connor (R)
Justice of Ohio Supreme Court - Judith Ann Lanzinger (R)
State Senate - Frank LaRose (R)
State House - Lynn Slaby (R)
US Senate - Rob Portman (R)
US House - Steve LaTourette (R)
For auditor the Democratic opponent didn't seem bad either. Both were pro-gun (not that it matters for an auditor). The Republican was endorsed by CPAs and the Democrat was endorsed by mostly newspapers. I think I'll side with the accountants.
There is also a school levy I think I'm going to vote for. It sounds like they have been trying to be frugal.
The most important ones are in orange.
Governor - Ted Strickland (D)
Lieutenant Governor - Mary Taylor (R)
Attorney General - Richard Cordray (D)
Secretary of State - Jon Husted (R)
Auditor - Dave Yost (R)
Treasurer - Josh Mandel (R)
Chief Justice of Ohio Supreme Court - Maureen O'Connor (R)
Justice of Ohio Supreme Court - Judith Ann Lanzinger (R)
State Senate - Frank LaRose (R)
State House - Lynn Slaby (R)
US Senate - Rob Portman (R)
US House - Steve LaTourette (R)
For auditor the Democratic opponent didn't seem bad either. Both were pro-gun (not that it matters for an auditor). The Republican was endorsed by CPAs and the Democrat was endorsed by mostly newspapers. I think I'll side with the accountants.
There is also a school levy I think I'm going to vote for. It sounds like they have been trying to be frugal.
Saturday, July 3, 2010
Punderson State Park - Recon
I saw online that Punderson State Park has an archery range--an unattended range. I was expecting perhaps some land set aside with signs and maybe some marked boxes on the ground showing where to stand and where to put the targets you brought with you.
I was curious and decided to go check it out since I was in the area. What I found was much more impressive than I expected.
They have a range going out to at least 50 yards with actual target backstops already in place.
Here's one from a distance. Notice there are also grooves for sledding on the hill in winter.
In addition to the fairly standard looking range, they also have something like an archery golf course back through the woods. You move from station to station and shoot.
Some additional random notes about Punderson:
I was curious and decided to go check it out since I was in the area. What I found was much more impressive than I expected.
They have a range going out to at least 50 yards with actual target backstops already in place.
Here's one from a distance. Notice there are also grooves for sledding on the hill in winter.
In addition to the fairly standard looking range, they also have something like an archery golf course back through the woods. You move from station to station and shoot.
Some additional random notes about Punderson:
- There is pretty decent tennis court at the top of the hill.
- There is a golf course and a Frisbee golf course.
- Restroom facilities range from not very good to actual hole in ground. Take some sanitizer.
Yum! - Perch sandwich
It is always difficult to find a good fish sandwich in Ohio. We aren't really known for seafood. Still I had an excellent fried perch sandwich today at Blazin Bills. Blazin, because it is a barbecue place in case there was a doubt.
Unfortunately, I didn't think of taking a picture until I had eaten half of it and fished of fresh baked bread they brought before it. It was delicious! It is a long way from my house, but I think I'll try to find some more excuses to drive out that way.
Unfortunately, I didn't think of taking a picture until I had eaten half of it and fished of fresh baked bread they brought before it. It was delicious! It is a long way from my house, but I think I'll try to find some more excuses to drive out that way.
Range Report
Today's trip to the range was primary to get used to shooting my new Ruger 10/22 with iron sights. It seems to be shooting about 3 inches high and 5 inches left. I should be able to adjust the sights compensate but stupidly forgot to bring the necessary tools to the range.
Below are some of my later targets at 50 yards after I tried to manually compensate. I have some work to do on my accuracy.
Below is also at 50 yards with my Savage 17HMR with 3-9x40mm scope and bipod. 1 shot per target. It is very good gun. I seriously believe the only reason they aren't all bulls-eyes at that here is only my level of skill. It is sighted for 100 yards. I was having a hard time forcing my self to aim low enough.
Below are some of my later targets at 50 yards after I tried to manually compensate. I have some work to do on my accuracy.
Below is also at 50 yards with my Savage 17HMR with 3-9x40mm scope and bipod. 1 shot per target. It is very good gun. I seriously believe the only reason they aren't all bulls-eyes at that here is only my level of skill. It is sighted for 100 yards. I was having a hard time forcing my self to aim low enough.
Saturday, May 29, 2010
Ohio Senate Bill 239 Passes - Restaurant Carry
A modification to the rules for concealed firearm carry passed the Ohio Senate Thursday. The Columbus Dispatch has the most detailed article I could find.
The Ohio Senate Bill, SB 239, like its House counterpart, HB 203, would allow CCW permit holders to exercise their permit in restaurants that serve alcohol just like they are allowed to already in any other store or restaurant, so long as they themselves do not drink.
I prefer the language of the Senate Bill to that of the House Bill because it actually removes words from the law and is easier to read. I don't really want to have to know about the different classes of liquor licenses to determine which buildings I can walk into.
SB 239 goes beyond the House Bill in that it also removes restrictions on how firearms may be carried in cars. The current law has some somewhat confusing language about closed containers and such which might be easy to violate accidentally or that may be unevenly enforced by officers. I personally consider this part of the revision far less important than the restaurant carry modification. There is some wisdom in at least requiring that that the weapon be holstered and in some way restrained so that it is not allowed to freely float around the car's interior. That said, I welcome simplification of the law. Hopefully that safety issue can be addressed just as effectively in training classes and the Ohio CCW handbook without requiring the force of law.
I would like to thank the Ohio Senators who voted for this bill and encourage the Ohio House members to act swiftly to pass it there as well. This is one of the few Ohio laws that affects my daily routine and I would very much like to see it adopted. It would certainly make going to Chipotle easier.
The Ohio Senate Bill, SB 239, like its House counterpart, HB 203, would allow CCW permit holders to exercise their permit in restaurants that serve alcohol just like they are allowed to already in any other store or restaurant, so long as they themselves do not drink.
I prefer the language of the Senate Bill to that of the House Bill because it actually removes words from the law and is easier to read. I don't really want to have to know about the different classes of liquor licenses to determine which buildings I can walk into.
SB 239 goes beyond the House Bill in that it also removes restrictions on how firearms may be carried in cars. The current law has some somewhat confusing language about closed containers and such which might be easy to violate accidentally or that may be unevenly enforced by officers. I personally consider this part of the revision far less important than the restaurant carry modification. There is some wisdom in at least requiring that that the weapon be holstered and in some way restrained so that it is not allowed to freely float around the car's interior. That said, I welcome simplification of the law. Hopefully that safety issue can be addressed just as effectively in training classes and the Ohio CCW handbook without requiring the force of law.
I would like to thank the Ohio Senators who voted for this bill and encourage the Ohio House members to act swiftly to pass it there as well. This is one of the few Ohio laws that affects my daily routine and I would very much like to see it adopted. It would certainly make going to Chipotle easier.
Saturday, March 13, 2010
Good use of a slow motion camera.
This guy makes fine use of a slow motion camera. The part around 2:09 is particularly good.
Sunday, August 16, 2009
Tom Knapp in Ohio, Aftermath
As I guessed it was indeed well worth the drive to see Tom Knapp. Nearly as impressive as his skill as a shooter was his skill as a showman and salesman. Benelli is very fortunate to have him on their team.
Below is just a small sample of what I saw in the show.
Below is just a small sample of what I saw in the show.
Saturday, August 8, 2009
Tom Knapp in Ohio
Tom Knapp the exhibition shooter for Benelli is coming to Ashland, Ohio next weekend for 3 shows at Fin Feather and Fur. I'm told there is no charge.
It should be well worth the drive to see him in person. He was recently featured on the History Channel's Extreme Marksmen and More Extreme Marksmen.
Forgive the hokey music but here's a vid up on youtube of some of his stuff.
It should be well worth the drive to see him in person. He was recently featured on the History Channel's Extreme Marksmen and More Extreme Marksmen.
Forgive the hokey music but here's a vid up on youtube of some of his stuff.
Saturday, June 20, 2009
Oldie but goodie
Here is a clip telling about Talking to the Police by Professor James Duane. Or more accurately, about why you shouldn't talk to the police. Worth a look, even if you think you'll always be innocent.
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Range report
A while ago I posted the story of how my purchase of a rifle scope off ebay went horribly wrong. I did eventually get the scope I wanted from another vendor and got it attached to a shiny new rifle. So I thought I would share my results. Here are the results on my last 2 targets at 100 yard.
These were shot using a Savage Arms Model 12 Varminter Low Profile in .308 Win with an Osprey 6-24x50mm scope off a Harris bench rest bipod on a wooden bench. The ammunition was military surplus 7.62x51 NATO FMJ boat tails made in Lithuania.
Being fairly new to shooting rifles as powerful as a .308 Win, it took me most of my range time to get used to dealing with the recoil. The Savage 2 stage accutrigger system helps a lot, but it can't negate the shooter flinching in anticipation of recoil.
The point of this post is just to say again what many already know... Savage makes extremely accurate rifles. It will be some time until I can use this one to its full potential. I am very impressed with the rifle and the scope. I'm sure there are better scopes in existence, but for the price I think you would have a hard time beating the Osprey.
These were shot using a Savage Arms Model 12 Varminter Low Profile in .308 Win with an Osprey 6-24x50mm scope off a Harris bench rest bipod on a wooden bench. The ammunition was military surplus 7.62x51 NATO FMJ boat tails made in Lithuania.
Being fairly new to shooting rifles as powerful as a .308 Win, it took me most of my range time to get used to dealing with the recoil. The Savage 2 stage accutrigger system helps a lot, but it can't negate the shooter flinching in anticipation of recoil.
The point of this post is just to say again what many already know... Savage makes extremely accurate rifles. It will be some time until I can use this one to its full potential. I am very impressed with the rifle and the scope. I'm sure there are better scopes in existence, but for the price I think you would have a hard time beating the Osprey.
Monday, May 25, 2009
Saturday, March 7, 2009
Gregory J Knox for President!
Wow, I just got done reading a letter from Gregory Knox, an automotive parts supplier in Ohio, addressed to General Motors. It was a breath of fresh air. It was inspiring, much like Ronald Reagan's "A Time for Choosing" speech. There may still be hope.
I keep hearing on the news that Rush Limbaugh may be "the voice" of the new republican party. This saddens me. If the Republican party is going to survive, if is going to matter, they don't need Rush Limbaugh. They need people like Gregory Knox. We need a party that does not exist to just to oppose the Democrats and protect the rich. We need a party that promotes moral and financial responsibility at all levels and protects all of our personal rights. Allow people to profit from wise and correct choices and to learn from poor ones. Allow every choice to make this country stronger and better.
I keep hearing on the news that Rush Limbaugh may be "the voice" of the new republican party. This saddens me. If the Republican party is going to survive, if is going to matter, they don't need Rush Limbaugh. They need people like Gregory Knox. We need a party that does not exist to just to oppose the Democrats and protect the rich. We need a party that promotes moral and financial responsibility at all levels and protects all of our personal rights. Allow people to profit from wise and correct choices and to learn from poor ones. Allow every choice to make this country stronger and better.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)